Documents

Over the years, the JRC has produced many publications. These are found in this section. They have been sub-divided in various categories (see Subcategory buttons below). All more than 600 documents can also be inspected irrespective of the category (see 'All documents' below).

Publications in Journals include more than 490 published papers from the Soil Group in the JRC (EU Soil Observatory). Most of the papers refer to the last 11 years (2013-2024). In many cases the papers document the datasets published in ESDAC.

As example statistics, Since the establishement of the EUSO,  the group published:

  • 52 papers in 2025
  • 47 papers in 2024
  • 46 papers in 2023
  • 40 papers in 2022
  • 27 papers in 2021
  • 23 papers in 2020

 

Most of them in high impact journals including Nature Communicaitons, Climate Change, Global Change Biology, etc. Almost all the publications are Open Access. As publications, we present articles published in peer-review journals indexed in Scopus or Web of Science.

Filters

Go Back To

All Documents

Displaying 201 - 225 of 666 | Show 25 | 50 | All results per page.
Phosphorus plant removal from European agricultural land
Phosphorus plant removal from European agricultural land
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022

Phosphorus (P) is an important nutrient for all plant growth and it has become a critical and often imbalanced element in modern agriculture. A proper crop fertilization is crucial for production, farmer profits, and also for ensuring sustainable agriculture. The European Commission has published the Farm to Fork (F2F) Strategy in May 2020, in which the reduction of the use of fertilizers by at least 20% is among one of the main objectives. Therefore, it is important to look for the optimal use of P in order to reduce its pollution effects but also ensure future agricultural production and food security. It is essential to estimate the P budget with the best available data at the highest possible spatial resolution. In this study, we focused on estimating the P removal from soils by crop harvest and removal of crop residues. Specifically, we attempted to estimate the P removal by taking into account the production area and productivity rates of 37 crops for 220 regions in the European Union (EU) and the UK. To estimate the P removal by crops, we included the P concentrations in plant tissues (%), the crop humidity rates, the crop residues production, and the removal rates of the crop residues. The total P removal was about 2.55 million tonnes (Mt) (± 0.23 Mt), with crop harvesting having the larger contribution (ca. 94%) compared to the crop residues removal. A Monte-Carlo analysis estimated a ± 9% uncertainty. In addition, we performed a projection of P removal from agricultural fields in 2030. By providing this picture, we aim to improve the current P balances in the EU and explore the feasibility of F2F objectives.

10.1007/s00003-022-01363-3

Improving the phosphorus budget of European agricultural soils
Improving the phosphorus budget of European agricultural soils
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022

Despite phosphorus (P) being crucial for plant nutrition and thus food security, excessive P fertilization harms soil and aquatic ecosystems. Accordingly, the European Green Deal and derived strategies aim to reduce P losses and fertilizer consumption in agricultural soils. The objective of this study is to calculate a soil P budget, allowing the quantification of the P surpluses/deficits in the European Union (EU) and the UK, considering the major inputs (inorganic fertilizers, manure, atmospheric deposition, and chemical weathering) and outputs (crop production, plant residues removal, losses by erosion) for the period 2011–2019.

The Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS) topsoil data include measured values for almost 22,000 samples for both available and total P. With advanced machine learning models, we developed maps for both attributes at 500 m resolution. We estimated the available P for crops at a mean value of 83 kg ha−1 with a clear distinction between North and South. The ratio of available P to the total P is about 1:17.

The inorganic fertilizers and manure contribute almost equally as P inputs (mean 16 ± 2 kg P ha−1 yr−1 at 90 % confidence level) to agricultural soils, with high regional variations depending on farming practices, livestock density, and cropping systems. The P outputs came mainly from the exportation by the harvest of crop products and residues (97.5 %) and, secondly, by erosion. Using a sediment distribution model, we quantified the P fluxes to river basins and sea outlets.

In the EU and UK, we estimated an average surplus of 0.8 kg P ha−1 yr−1 with high variability between countries with some regional variations. The P annual budget at regional scale showed ample possibility to improve P management by both reducing inputs in regions with high surplus (and P soil available) and rebalancing fertilization in those at risk of soil fertility depletion.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158706


 

Computation of total soil organic carbon stock and its standard deviation from layered soils
Computation of total soil organic carbon stock and its standard deviation from layered soils
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022

To assess carbon sequestration in the agricultural and natural systems, it is usually required to report soil organic carbon (SOC) as mass per unit area (Mg ha-1) for a single soil layer (e.g., the 0-0.3 m ploughing layer). However, if the SOC data are reported as relative concentration (g kg-1 or %), it is required to compute the SOC stock and its standard deviation (SD) for a given layer as the product of SOC concentration and bulk density (BD). For a proper computation, it is required to consider that these two variables are correlated. Moreover, if the data are already reported as SOC stock for multiple sub-layers (e.g., 0-0.15 m, 0.15-0.3 m) it is necessary to compute the SOC stock and its SD for a single soil layer (e.g., 0-0.3 m). The correlation between stocks values from adjacent and non-adjacent soil sub-layers must be accounted to compute the SD of the single soil layer.

The present work illustrates the methodology to compute SOC stock and its SD for a single soil layer based on SOC concentration and BD also from multiple sub-layers. An Excel workbook automatically computes the means of stocks and SD saving the results in a ready-to-use database.
•Computation of a carbon (SOC) stock and its standard deviation (SD) from the product between SOC concentration and bulk density (BD), being correlated variables.
•Computation of a SOC stock and its SD from the sum of SOC stocks of multiple correlated sub-layers.
•An Excel workbook automatically computes the means of SOC stocks and SD and saves the results in a ready-to-use database.

10.1016/j.mex.2022.101662

48-year effect on organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in two soil types in northwestern Tunisia
48-year effect on organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in two soil types in northwestern Tunisia
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022

Information on spatial and temporal changes in the soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) stocks are crucial to support sustainable land management strategies. However, such information is scarce mainly for arid and semi-arid regions. The present research aimed to determine SOC and STN stock dynamics with depths during the 1971–2019 period. Thus, two soil types were selected in north Tunisia: a Luvisol under forest vegetation and a Cambisol under cereal crop and analyzed for SOC, STN, rock fraction, and bulk density from the surface (0–30 cm), middle (30–50 cm), and deep layers (50–100 cm) in 1971, 2005, 2012, and 2019. SOC and STN contents decreased with depth in both soils. The Luvisol exhibited the highest SOC and STN contents. From 1971 to 2019, SOC and STN contents decreased more in the surface layer in both soils with sharpest decrease for STN than SOC. The stocks were calculated taking into account the rock fractions avoiding overestimation. Stocks recorded in the surface layer corresponded to 68% of total SOC stock and 58% of total STN stock in both soils. From 1971 to 2019, the reduction of SOC and STN stocks was more important in the Cambisol than in the Luvisol in all layers, mainly in the surface layer. Such reductions could have important implications for soil fertility and global warming

10.1007/s12517-022-09860-3

Developing a high-resolution land use/land cover map by upgrading CORINE’s agricultural components using detailed national and pan-European datasets
Developing a high-resolution land use/land cover map by upgrading CORINE’s agricultural components using detailed national and pan-European datasets
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2022

The agricultural uses of the Coordination of Information on the Environment Land Cover (CLC) dataset suffer from limitations such as temporal stationarity, low spatial resolution, broad and rather simplified grouping of classes. The study attempts to address these shortcomings, using as test site the Sperchios River catchment, Central Greece. The Greek ‘branch’ of the Land Parcel Identification System, Beneficiaries’ Declarations (BD) and CLC inventories were utilized to develop hybrid layers, deriving from their harmonization, sequential incorporation and progressive update (BD → BD-ilot → BD-ilot-CLC). The final layer constitutes the new object-oriented Land Use/Land Cover map. Remote sensing data (Sentinel-2) was used to validate the accuracy of the BD, subject to the most frequent errors. The new map retains the key advantages of CLC yet is now characterized by highly detailed spatial resolution and the explicit description of the different cultivated farmlands included.

10.1080/10106049.2022.2041107

LANDSUPPORT Decision Support Systems: performance at EU, country, regional and local scale
LANDSUPPORT Decision Support Systems: performance at EU, country, regional and local scale
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Scientific-Technical Reports
Year: 2022

Developing a methodology for the analysis of the anthropogenic intervention on natural capital is an ambitious process. The LANDSUPPORT project implemented a Decision Support System (DSS) to help support better land use planning. The LANDSUPPORT DSS aimed at creating an innovative and intuitive environment that will improve the readability of measured and modelled geo-information, making it accessible to a wide range of stakeholders. A cross-evaluation analysis has been developed to measure the ability to support policy-related stakeholders and help them make informed decisions.

In the field of land use and land management, appropriate data are essential to support effective land planning in which different sources of available information need to be synthesised to provide an holistic picture of their combined effect. Policy stakeholders play a pivotal role in designing the DSS to be transversal and able to cope with issues at local, national and regional scales. National and regional land monitoring projects are often evenly disseminated or unsuitable for policy needs. Many attempts were recently made to overcome this problem, and the concept of decision dashboards is now extensively used to address these challenges. DSS are growing in popularity. They are often distributed as open access online interfaces that use georeferenced data and visualization tools to present model metrics and key performance indicators. Data behind DSSs can be static or dynamic as it is for the LANDSUPPORT DSS. The set of tools developed at different scales within different domains of application, are regularly updated and obtained from the state-of-the-art scientific development. With the user in mind, the LANDSUPPORT DSS encourages an extensive range of policy stakeholders to perform land use analysis, improving the tool's usability and making informed decisions for land sustainability. Decisions on land management at local scale are already benefiting from such information systems.


For the EU, specific tools were developed, tailored to the specific needs of stakeholders. For instance, in line with its strategic plan, Italy uses specific functionality and indicator sets to support its decision-making across agriculture sectors (viticulture and oliviculture tools are tailored examples of the DSS dynamism).
Another goal of DSS is to improve geodata integration across highly compartmentalized sectors. Each tool which appears in the dashboard will undergo regular improvements as the backend platform is refined. The LANDSUPPORT tool allows for the analysis of soil sealing in the land take tool, the land degradation neutrality tool (SDG 15.3.1 indicator), and the climate change resilience through another dedicated tool embedding future scenarios of climate change based on CORDEX ensemble models and (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCPs). Given the challenge of identifying and gaining access to good quality data from local partners, the LANDSUPPORT project fostered the capacity building among partners through workshops and other interactions and drew attention to better data management and improved accessibility and sharing. Embedding data access and its use in end-user organizations is vital to generating and sustaining interest in the dashboards.

This report presents the analysis carried out to test the LANDSUPPORT DSS’s ability to support EU policies when applied at the EU scale. Key EU policies of interest include the 7th Environmental Action Porgamme; COM 2006/231 Soil Strategy, Dir 2000/60/EC Water Directive; Dir 2007/2/EC INSPIRE Directive. and the land-related targets of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in particular, SDGs 2 “Zero Hunger”, 3 “god healh and well-being”, 13 “Climate action”, 15, with a special emphasis to the key SDG 15.3.1, “achieving a land degradation-neutral world” (LDN) and climate change (CC) mitigation goals.

EU Soil Observatory 2021
EU Soil Observatory 2021
Resource Type: Documents, Scientific-Technical Reports, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022

The scope of this document is to provide a synthesis of the achievements of the EU Soil Observatory (EUSO) during its first year of existence. The EUSO aims to become the principal provider of reference data and knowledge at EU-level for all matters relating to soil. The EUSO will be a dynamic and inclusive platform that supports EU soil-related policymaking by providing its stakeholder base with the knowledge and data flows needed to safeguard and restore soils.
Since its launch on December 4th 2020, most efforts have focused on defining and developing concepts associated with the main tasks of the Observatory (monitoring, dashboard, support to R&I, citizen engagement). Efforts have also been made to consolidate and enhance the capacity and functionality of the European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC), which is at the heart of the Observatory.
Major developments for 2021 included the establishment of an interservice Steering Committee (chaired by the Director of JRC Sustainable Resources Directorate), the support to the EU Mission “A Soil Deal for Europe", the development of the knowledge base on soil through research at the JRC, and the organisation of the 1st EUSO Stakeholder Forum.
The EUSO Stakeholder Forum was attended by over 1 000 participants over a three-day period in October 2021. In this sense, it succeeded in bringing a EUSO community together and in establishing a two-way dialogue with its user base. A summary of the event is presented in this report. EUSO activities will intensify in 2022.

Soil health in the Western Balkans
Soil health in the Western Balkans
Resource Type: Documents, Scientific-Technical Reports, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022
Attachments: PDF icon KJNA31163ENN.en_.pdf
This study is a compilation of evidence to support the development of a soil component for a JRC Science for Policy Report on the “Status of Environment and Climate in the Western Balkans”1. This document attempts to benchmark a range of issues affecting soil health with considerations on the accession progress for an eventual Soil Health Law under the 2030 Soil Strategy.
The outcomes reported here are based on a literature review of 139 sources, bilateral exchanges with national soil experts in all Western Balkans countries, and on the personal experience of the authors. It should be emphasised that current data are scarce, and as such, the results should be considered as a primarily assessment and not definitive.
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that soil degradation is prevalent and extensive throughout the Western Balkans region. Soils are under pressure, but the intensity of various soil health indicators varies between them and among the countries. Climate change was not part of this study. Nevertheless, its impacts will be relevant in the coming decades, if not preventive mitigation, remediation, and adaptation actions will be needed to lessen their impacts.
Download the Report.
 
Soil priorities in the European Union
Soil priorities in the European Union
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2022

Soils provide crucial ecosystem services such as the provision of food, carbon sequestration and water purification. Soil is the largest terrestrial pool of carbon, hosts more than 25% of all biodiversity and provides 95–99% of food to 8 billion people. The European Union (EU) puts the concept of healthy soils at the core of the European Green Deal to achieve climate neutrality, zero pollution, sustainable food provision and a resilient environment.

Given the European Union's objective to become the first climate neutral continent by 2050, the European Commission adopted a series of communications for a greener Europe. In 2020, an ambitious package of measures were presented within the Biodiversity 2030, Farm to Fork and Chemicals Strategies, as well as the Circular Economy Action Plan and the European Climate Law, which included actions to protect soils (Montanarella and Panagos, 2021). In 2021, these were followed by the Fit for 55 package, the Zero Pollution Action Plan and the EU Soil Strategy for 2030. All these policies include provisions relevant to soils to achieve the ambitious objectives of the EU Green Deal.

10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00510

LUCAS 2018 Soil Module
LUCAS 2018 Soil Module
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Scientific-Technical Reports
Year: 2022

This report accompanies the release of the soil dataset collected as part of the 2018 Land Use/Cover Area frame statistical Survey’ (generally referred to as LUCAS Soil). It presents an overview of the laboratory analysis data and provides a detailed description of the results for the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom as it was still a Member State at the time of the survey. The report describes the spatial variability of soil properties by land cover (LC) class and a comparative analysis of the soil properties for NUTS 2 regions.

Regular monitoring provides a unique perspective on pressures affecting soils. In this respect, the soil module of LUCAS supports the specific needs of the European Commission by collecting data that characterises soil condition and health, which can be affected in relation to land use practices and other activities that are driven by specific policy instruments.
The LUCAS Soil module is the only mechanism that currently provides a harmonised and regular collection of soil data for the entire territory of the EU, addressing all major land cover types simultaneously, in a single sampling period (April – October).
At the same time, the LUCAS Soil module can support further policy needs through a flexibility that permits both the collection of new field data, if required, from new sampling sites. In turn, this can be complemented with additional laboratory analysis (e.g. micronutrients, specific pollutants). This capacity addresses the needs of a diverse policy user base and an evolving policy landscape.
The drive to collect soil samples under the umbrella of LUCAS was led initially by DG Environment, who provided funding for the 2009 survey to collect a baseline dataset on a range of soil characteristics such as organic matter content, nutrient status, fertility, acidification and soil pollution (metals). At that time, the main LUCAS survey was planned for 23 EU Member States (MS). Bulgaria and Romania were added in 2012 while Croatia, Cyprus and Malta were formally included in 2015. In the 2018 survey, all 28 MS at the time were included.
The initial premise was developed to collect samples from a depth of 20 cm following a common sampling procedure from 10% of the sites where field visits were to be carried out as part of the main LUCAS survey. In 2009, this gave around 235,000 possible locations for a nominal target of 23,500 soil samples. At the end of the survey, about 20,000 had been collected. These samples were analysed according to standard analytical methods in a single laboratory for a range of physical and chemical properties. In addition, visible and near-infrared spectra were acquired for all samples. The process was repeated in 2012 for Bulgaria and Romania, where samples were collected from about 2,000 locations. In total, 22,003 samples were analysed for 2009/2012.
In 2015, 90% of the locations sampled in 2009 and 2012 were maintained with the remaining 10% being substituted by new locations, including points at altitudes above 1,000 m, which were out of scope of the earlier surveys. In total, 21,859 samples were collected, of which 4,246 were at new locations compared with the 2009/2012 campaign. In addition, the soil module was extended by the JRC Enlargement and Integration Programme to Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia (1,015 samples were eventually collected). Switzerland also participated following standard LUCAS protocols (150 samples were collected by Agroscope).
For 2018, 27,069 locations were identified for soil sampling. A soil related activity (i.e. assessing type of erosion, organic soil check sample collection) was made at 19,345 locations (LUCAS Grid Points). After the removal of samples that could not be identified or were mislabelled or lost in transit, the LUCAS 2018 Soil Module dataset contains data for 18,984 locations.
Regulations on Nitrate Use and Management
Regulations on Nitrate Use and Management
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Provides an overview of the entire nitrate cycle and the processes influencing nitrate transformation, and clearly identifies its role as an essential nutrient in plant growth, food preservation, and human health. It explains the discrepancies between public perceptions on nitrate harm versus the beneficial effects on human health.

Download the article

The Relevance of Black Soils for Sustainable Development
The Relevance of Black Soils for Sustainable Development
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2021

Black Soils have attracted renewed attention from policy-makers and the public thanks to strong interest from China; an International Network on Black Soils was launched in 2017 and the first plenary meeting held in Harbin in 2018. The Chernozem originally defined by Dokuchaev in 1883 is the central concept of Black Soils but, more than 140 years on, these soils have been much changed by human intervention and there is a need for a new definition—including Chernozem but, also, other soils with similar properties. The term Black Soils is taken to encompass Chernozem, Kastanozem and Phaeozem—all characterized by thick, dark-coloured, humus-rich topsoil originally developed under grassland. Chernozems, in particular, are known for their granular structure, optimal bulk density, and goodly stock of plant nutrients; however, all these favorable properties are only present in soils within virgin ecosystems that are now rare. Black Soils make up only 7% of the land surface but they are of fundamental importance to food security; UN Sustainable Development Goal 2—to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030—will only be achieved if we introduce a mandatory framework for their sustainable management. Sustainable management means arrest of soil erosion, compaction, salinity, sodicity, pollution and soil sealing; maintenance of protective cover, a stable stock of soil organic matter both as a store of plant nutrients and as a carbon sink; maintenance of capacity to infiltrate and hold rainfall and irrigation water but drain any excess to streams and groundwater; and conservation of biodiversity to maintain essential soil functions.

Download Chapter

Soil Security for the European Union
Soil Security for the European Union
Resource Type: Documents, Publications in Journals, Maps & Documents
Year: 2021

Soil security has emerged during the recent years as a new paradigm for addressing sustainable soil management. Soil security was first presented in the literature in 2013–2014 (Koch et al., 2013; McBratney et al., 2014). Both publications defined soil security as the maintenance and improvement of the world's soil resources so that they can continue to provide food and fresh water, make major contributions to energy and climate sustainability, and help maintaining biodiversity and the overall protection of ecosystem goods and services. After the first publications on soil security, some regional studies addressed the subject in Australia (Bennett et al., 2019) and Tasmania (Kidd et al., 2018). Meanwhile, soil security starts to gain the momentum as it is linked to crop production and global climate (Beerling et al., 2018), soil contamination and human health (Carre et al., 2017; Brevik et al., 2017), farming and ecosystem services (Dazzi et al., 2019) and with the Sustainable Development Goals (Bouma, 2020).

Therefore, soil security is developed as a concept in analogy with the other six existential global environmental challenges (e.g. provision of food, fresh water, energy, climate sustainability, maintenance of biodiversity, protection of ecosystem goods and services). Soil security is described by five dimensions known as 5Cs: soil Capability, Condition, Capital, Connectivity & Codification (Koch et al., 2013; McBratney et al., 2014). Here, we discuss the implications of soil security for the European Union's sustainability.

Link: 10.1016/j.soisec.2021.100009

Metabarcoding of Soil Fungal Communities Associated with Alpine Field-Grown Saffron ( Crocus sativus L.) Inoculated with AM Fung
Metabarcoding of Soil Fungal Communities Associated with Alpine Field-Grown Saffron ( Crocus sativus L.) Inoculated with AM Fung
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021
Language: en

Soil fungi strongly influence ecosystem structure and functioning, playing a key role in many ecological services as decomposers, plant mutualists and pathogens. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) establish mutualistic symbiotic associations with plant roots and act as biofertilizers by enhancing plant nutrients and water uptake. Information about the AMF association with Crocus sativus L. (saffron) and their impact on crop performances and spice quality has been increasing in recent years. Instead, there is still little data on the biodiversity of soil microbial communities associated with this crop in the Alpine environments. The aims of this study were to investigate the fungal communities of two Alpine experimental sites cultivated with saffron, and to rank the relative impact of two AMF inocula, applied to soil as single species (R = Rhizophagus intraradices, C. Walker & A. Schüßler) or a mixture of two species (M = R. intraradices and Funneliformis mosseae, C. Walker & A. Schüßler), on the resident fungal communities which might be influenced in their diversity and composition. We used Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding on nuclear ribosomal ITS2 region to characterize the fungal communities associated to Crocus sativus cultivation in two fields, located in the municipalities of Saint Christophe (SC) and Morgex (MG), (Aosta Valley, Italy), treated or not with AMF inocula and sampled for two consecutive years (Y1; Y2). Data analyses consistently indicated that Basidiomycota were particularly abundant in both sites and sampling years (Y1 and Y2). Significant differences in the distribution of fungal taxa assemblages at phylum and class levels between the two sites were also found. The main compositional differences consisted in significant abundance changes of OTUs belonging to Dothideomycetes and Leotiomycetes (Ascomycota), Agaricomycetes and Tremellomycetes (Basidiomycota), Mortierellomycetes and Mucoromycetes. Further differences concerned OTUs, of other classes, significantly represented only in the first or second year of sampling. Concerning Glomeromycota, the most represented genus was Claroideoglomus always detected in both sites and years. Other AMF genera such as Funneliformis, Septoglomus and Microdominikia, were retrieved only in MG site. Results highlighted that neither sites nor inoculation significantly impacted Alpine saffron-field fungal communities; instead, the year of sampling had the most appreciable influence on the resident communities

10.3390/jof7010045

A first assessment of rainfall erosivity synchrony scale at pan-European scale
A first assessment of rainfall erosivity synchrony scale at pan-European scale
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Soil loss by water erosion is a major land degradation processes that can locally reduce crop productivity and cause off-site negative effects such as siltation, eutrophication of waterways, flooding and terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity loss. The major driver of water erosion is the erosive power of rainfall. Using the detailed erosive events of the Rainfall Erosivity Database at European Scale (REDES), we study the characteristics and patterns of rainfall erosivity in Europe introducing the Rainfall Erosivity Synchrony Scale (Rsync). Rsync expresses the maximum radius in kilometers around a given meteorological station within which at least half of the other meteorological stations in the database also detect an erosive event. In this study we correlate the Rsync and the annual erosivity with annual number of thunderstorm days, convective and large-scale precipitation and multiple geo-morphological features such as topographic position index and terrain ruggedness index. Our analysis shows an inverse relationship between the Rsync and rainfall erosivity values in Europe. Different spatial patterns of synchrony scale are detected in Europe, which enables us to delineate areas where severe soil erosion can simultaneously occur at larger scales, e.g., large sectors of Italy, Spain, Croatia and Slovenia. Furthermore, we observe a tendency of the Rsync to decrease with convective precipitation, annual number of thunderstorm days and increase with the large-scale precipitation. On the contrary, annual rainfall erosivity increases with convective precipitation and annual number of thunderstorm days and decreases with large-scale precipitation.


10.1016/j.catena.2020.105060

Measuring, modelling and managing gully erosion at large scales: A state of the art
Measuring, modelling and managing gully erosion at large scales: A state of the art
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Soil erosion is generally recognized as the dominant process of land degradation. The formation and expansion of gullies is often a highly significant process of soil erosion. However, our ability to assess and simulate gully erosion and its impacts remains very limited. This is especially so at regional to continental scales. As a result, gullying is often overlooked in policies and land and catchment management strategies. Nevertheless, significant progress has been made over the past decades. Based on a review of >590 scientific articles and policy documents, we provide a state-of-the-art on our ability to monitor, model and manage gully erosion at regional to continental scales. In this review we discuss the relevance and need of assessing gully erosion at regional to continental scales (Section 1); current methods to monitor gully erosion as well as pitfalls and opportunities to apply them at larger scales (section 2); field-based gully erosion research conducted in Europe and European Russia (section 3); model approaches to simulate gully erosion and its contribution to catchment sediment yields at large scales (section 4); data products that can be used for such simulations (section 5); and currently existing policy tools and needs to address the problem of gully erosion (section 6). Section 7 formulates a series of recommendations for further research and policy development, based on this review. While several of these sections have a strong focus on Europe, most of our findings and recommendations are of global significance.

10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103637

Copper Content and Export in European Vineyard Soils Influenced by Climate and Soil Properties
Copper Content and Export in European Vineyard Soils Influenced by Climate and Soil Properties
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Copper-based fungicides (Cuf) are used in European (EU) vineyards to prevent fungal diseases. Soil physicochemical properties locally govern the variation of the total copper content (Cut) in EU vineyards. However, variables controlling Cut distribution at a larger scale are poorly known. Here, machine learning techniques were used to identify governing variables and to predict the Cut distribution in EU vineyards. Precipitation, aridity and soil organic carbon are key variables explaining together 45% of Cut distribution across EU vineyards. This underlines the effect of both climate and soil properties on Cut distribution. The average net export of Cu at the EU scale is 0.29 kg Cu ha–1, which is 2 orders of magnitude less than the net accumulation of Cu (24.8 kg Cu ha–1). Four scenarios of Cuf application were compared. The current EU regulation with a maximum of 4 kg Cu ha–1 year–1 may increase by 2% of the EU vineyard area, exceeding the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) in soil in the next 100 years. Overall, our results highlight the vineyard areas requiring specific remediation measures and strategies of Cuf use to manage a trade-off between pest control and soil and water contamination.

10.1021/acs.est.0c02093

Mercury in European topsoils: Anthropogenic sources, stocks and fluxes
Mercury in European topsoils: Anthropogenic sources, stocks and fluxes
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Mercury (Hg) is one of the most dangerous pollutants worldwide. In the European Union (EU), we recently estimated the Hg distribution in topsoil using 21,591 samples and a series of geo-physical inputs. In this manuscript, we investigate the impact of mining activities, chrol-alkali industries and other diffuse pollution sources as primary anthropogenic sources of Hg hotspots in the EU. Based on Hg measured soil samples, we modelled the Hg pool in EU topsoils, which totals about 44.8 Gg, with an average density of 103 g ha−1. As a following step, we coupled the estimated Hg stocks in topsoil with the pan-European assessment of soil loss due to water erosion and sediment distribution. In the European Union and UK, we estimated that about 43 Mg Hg yr−1 are displaced by water erosion and c. a. 6 Mg Hg yr−1 are transferred with sediments to river basins and eventually released to coastal Oceans. The Mediterranean Sea receives almost half (2.94 Mg yr−1) of the Hg fluxes to coastal oceans and it records the highest quantity of Hg sediments. This is the result of elevated soil Hg concentration and high erosion rates in the catchments draining into the Mediterranean Sea. This work contributes to new knowledge in support of the policy development in the EU on the Zero Pollution Action Plan and the Sustainable Development Goal (SDGs) 3.9 and 14.1, which both have as an objective to reduce soil pollution by 2030.

10.1016/j.envres.2021.111556

Spatial evaluation and trade-off analysis of soil functions through Bayesian networks
Spatial evaluation and trade-off analysis of soil functions through Bayesian networks
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

There is increasing recognition that soils fulfil many functions for society. Each soil can deliver a range of functions, but some soils are more effective at some functions than others due to their intrinsic properties. In this study we mapped four different soil functions on agricultural lands across the European Union. For each soil function, indicators were developed to evaluate their performance. To calculate the indicators and assess the interdependencies between the soil functions, data from continental long-term simulation with the DayCent model were used to build crop-specific Bayesian networks. These Bayesian Networks were then used to calculate the soil functions' performance and trade-offs between the soil functions under current conditions. For each soil function the maximum potential was estimated across the European Union and changes in trade-offs were assessed. By deriving current and potential soil function delivery from Bayesian networks a better understanding is gained of how different soil functions and their interdependencies can differ depending on soil, climate and management.

10.1111/ejss.13039

Soil Biodiversity: State-of-the-Art and Possible Implementation in Chemical Risk Assessment
Soil Biodiversity: State-of-the-Art and Possible Implementation in Chemical Risk Assessment
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Protecting the structure and functioning of soil ecosystems is one of the central aims of current regulations of chemicals. This is, for instance, shown by the emphasis on the protection of key drivers and ecosystem services as proposed in the protection goal options for soil organisms by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Such targets require insight into soil biodiversity, its role in the functioning of ecosystems, and the way it responds to stress. Also required are tools and methodologies for properly assessing biodiversity. To address these issues, the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Europe 14th Special Science Symposium (SESSS14) was held 19 to 20 November 2019 in Brussels, Belgium. The central aim of the SESSS14 was to provide information on how to include soil biodiversity and soil functions as protection goal options in the risk assessment and quantification of the effects of chemicals and other stressors (including their respective regulations). This paper is based on the presentations and discussions at the SESSS14 and will give a brief update on the scientific state-of-the art on soil biodiversity, novel scientific developments, experimental and modeling approaches, as well as case studies. It will also discuss how these approaches could inform future risk assessment of chemicals and other stressors in the regulatory context of protecting soil ecosystems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:541–551. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)

10.1002/ieam.4371

Projections of soil loss by water erosion in Europe by 2050
Projections of soil loss by water erosion in Europe by 2050
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Changes in future soil erosion rates are driven by climatic conditions, land use patterns, socio-economic development, farmers’ choices, and importantly modified by agro-environmental policies. This study simulates the impact of expected climatic and land use change projections on future rates of soil erosion by water (sheet and rill processes) in 2050 within the agricultural areas of the European Union and the UK, compared to a current representative baseline (2016). We used the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) adjusted at continental scale with projections of future rainfall erosivity and land use change. Future rainfall erosivity is predicted using an average composite of 19 Global Climate Models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Projects (CMIP5) WorldClim dataset across three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). Concerning future land use change and crop dynamics, we used the projections provided by the Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact Analysis (CAPRI) model.

Depending on the RCP scenario, we estimate a +13 %-22.5 % increase in the mean soil erosion rate in the EU and UK, rising from an estimated 3.07 t ha−1 yr−1 (2016) to between 3.46 t ha−1 yr−1 (RCP2.6 scenario) and 3.76 t ha−1 yr−1 (RCP8.5 scenario). Here, we disentangle the impact of land use change and climate change in relation to future soil losses. Projected land use change in the EU and UK indicates an overall increase of pasture coverage in place of croplands. This land use change is estimated to reduce soil erosion rates (-3%). In contrast, the increases in future rainfall erosivity (+15.7 %–25.5 %) will force important increases of soil erosion requiring further targeted intervention measures. Given that agro-environmental policies will be the most effective mechanisms to offset this future increase in soil erosion rates, this study proposes soil conservation instruments foreseen in the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to run policy scenarios. A targeted application of cover crops in soil erosion hotspots combined with limited soil disturbance measures can partially or completely mitigate the effect of climate change on soil losses. Effective mitigation of future soil losses requires policy measures for soil conservation on at least 50 % of agricultural land with erosion rates above 5 t ha−1 yr−1.


10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.012

Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity: A monitoring and indicator system can inform policy
Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity: A monitoring and indicator system can inform policy
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Nature conservation literature and policy instruments mainly focus on the impacts of human development and the benefits of nature conservation for oceans and aboveground terrestrial organisms (e.g., birds and plants) and processes (e.g., food production), but these efforts almost completely ignore the majority of terrestrial biodiversity that is unseen and living in the soil (1). Little is known about the conservation status of most soil organisms and the effects of nature conservation policies on soil systems. Yet like “canaries in the coal mine,” when soil organisms begin to disappear, ecosystems will soon start to underperform, potentially hindering their vital functions for humankind. Soil biodiversity and its ecosystem functions thus require explicit consideration when establishing nature protection priorities and policies and when designing new conservation areas. To inform such efforts, we lay out a global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function monitoring framework to be considered in the context of the post-2020 discussions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). To support this framework, we suggest a suite of soil ecological indicators based on essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) (2) (see the figure and table S3) that directly link to current global targets such as the ones established under the CBD, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the Paris Agreement

10.1126/science.abd7926

An in-depth statistical analysis of the rainstorms erosivity in Europe
An in-depth statistical analysis of the rainstorms erosivity in Europe
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

Heavy rainstorms play a central role in the water-driving soil erosion processes. An in-depth knowledge about temporal and spatial erosivity of rainfall events is required to gain a better understanding of soil erosion processes and optimize soil protection measures efficiency. In this study, the spatiotemporal distribution of more than 300,000 erosive events measured at 1181 locations, part of the Rainfall Erosivity Database at European Scale (REDES) database, is studied to shed some new light on the rainfall erosivity in Europe. Rainfall erosive events are statistically investigated through the Lorenz curve and derived coefficients such as the Gini coefficient (G). Additionally, seasonal characteristics of the most and the less erosive events are compared to investigate seasonal characteristics of rainstorms across Europe. The G shows largest values of inequality of the inter-annual temporal distribution of the rainfall erosive events in the Alpine region, mostly due to the large number of rainfall events with smaller rainfall erosivity. While for other parts of Europe, the inequality described by the G is mostly due to a small number of high erosive events. The G slightly decreases from south to north while no clear regional patterns can be detected. Additionally, in Europe, on average 11% (ranging from 1 to 24%) of all erosive events contribute to form 50% of the total rainfall erosivity. Furthermore, higher erosive rainfall events tend to occur later in the year compared to less erosive events that take place earlier. To our knowledge, this study is the first one addressing event scale rainfall erosivity distribution using more than 300,000 rainfall erosivity events and covering almost a whole continent. Scientifically our findings represent a major step towards large-scale process-based erosion modelling while, practically, they provide new elements that can support national and local soil erosion monitoring programs.

10.1016/j.catena.2021.105577

Large-scale drivers of relationships between soil microbial properties and organic carbon across Europe
Large-scale drivers of relationships between soil microbial properties and organic carbon across Europe
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

We collected 881 soil samples from across Europe in the framework of the Land Use/Land Cover Area Frame Survey (LUCAS). We measured potential soil basal respiration at 20 ºC and microbial biomass (substrate-induced respiration) using an O2-microcompensation apparatus. Soil and climate data were obtained from the same LUCAS survey and online databases. Structural equation models (SEMs) were used to quantify relationships between variables, and equations extracted from SEMs were used to create predictive maps. Fatty acid methyl esters were measured in a subset of samples to distinguish fungal from bacterial biomass.Soil microbial properties in croplands were more heavily affected by climate variables than those in forests. Potential soil basal respiration and microbial biomass were correlated in forests but decoupled in grasslands and croplands, where microbial biomass depended on soil carbon. Forests had a higher ratio of fungi to bacteria than grasslands or croplands.
Soil microbial communities in grasslands and croplands are likely carbon-limited in comparison with those in forests, and forests have a higher dominance of fungi indicating differences in microbial community composition. Notably, the often already-degraded soils of croplands could be more vulnerable to climate change than more natural soils. The provided maps show potentially vulnerable areas that should be explicitly accounted for in future management plans to protect soil carbon and slow the increasing vulnerability of European soils to climate change.

10.1111/geb.13371

Arable lands under the pressure of multiple land degradation processes. A global perspective
Arable lands under the pressure of multiple land degradation processes. A global perspective
Resource Type: Maps & Documents, Documents, Publications in Journals
Year: 2021

While agricultural systems are a major pillar in global food security, their productivity is currently threatened by many environmental issues triggered by anthropogenic climate change and human activities, such as land degradation. However, the planetary spatial footprint of land degradation processes on arable lands, which can be considered a major component of global agricultural systems, is still insufficiently well understood. This study analyzes the land degradation footprint on global arable lands, using complex geospatial data on certain major degradation processes, i.e. aridity, soil erosion, vegetation decline, soil salinization and soil organic carbon decline. By applying geostatistical techniques that are representative for identifying the incidence of the five land degradation processes in global arable lands, results showed that aridity is by far the largest singular pressure for these agricultural systems, affecting ~40% of the arable lands' area, which cover approximately 14 million km2 globally. It was found that soil erosion is another major degradation process, the unilateral impact of which affects ~20% of global arable systems. The results also showed that the two degradation processes simultaneously affect an additional ~7% of global arable lands, which makes this synergy the most common form of multiple pressure of land degradative conditions across the world's arable areas. The absolute statistical data showed that India, the United States, China, Brazil, Argentina, Russia and Australia are the most vulnerable countries in the world to the various pathways of arable land degradation. Also, in terms of percentages, statistical observations showed that African countries are the most heavily affected by arable system degradation. This study's findings can be useful for prioritizing agricultural management actions that can mitigate the negative effects of the two degradation processes or of others that currently affect many arable systems across the planet.

10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697